top of page
Search
Writer's pictureJillian Epperly

Are Prostitutes Necessary?

Interesting thought, I suppose the world needs more "prostitutes" because when men need to "get some", he almost must be deceptive and use mind games to find a way into her "pants".. How many young women in their lives were deceived by someone's raging hormones promising them the world? How many women thought having a child would keep their family together?


 How many women who had children with their husbands and boyfriends allowed the children to build a wedge in between her and her husband? How many women were under the impression the children always came first in everything thus sacrificing her own life and marriage? Why do you think there is probably more than 50% divorce rate?


However, with that said, would legalized and in your face prostitution cause society to descend in such moral decay with no hope of returning to order? Even if you hid prostitution behind dating sites and massage parlors, someone would find a way to use that information for nefarious purposes like blackmail.


So, I retract my initial thought that all women need to be a certain way. I suppose it is beneficial for society to have a harem of women only to be used in "one way" and that is it.

It seems the deception of hormones during the teen years forces young men into becoming the "bad guy" right out of the gate thus tainting all men everywhere by jilted women who thought having a family with a guy who was not Mr. Right, would be the thing to do.


And women are not innocent either when it comes to sexuality because of raging hormones but I use men as an example because they have been pigeonholed to being the aggressor in a lot of sexual relationships at a young age. But we also know women can also be the aggressor but maybe a little bit later on in life not so early. Again there's always exceptions to the rule


 In my opinion, the system "should not" allow anyone to get married until they turn 50, after a lifetime of experiences and sowing wild oats and then give them the choice.


If infertility is in the future (like they said), then there would be no reason to get married so young during the "fertile" years. Then men and women could be free to just get it on without any "repercussions" and then later on when they decide to slow down, settle down with someone who is on the same wavelength and they both would have a lifetime of experiences and lesson to share and they both would have brought something to the table. They both would have proved they could manage money, time and priorities and now it is the time to streamline resources with a responsible partner.


But, for this idea to make sense logistically, humans would have to prolong their life and do things differently so they did not start breaking down at 30, 40 and 50. Something else must happen in society to have this lifestyle make sense.


Society would have to be amenable to giving people time to release disease and eat for the community ensuring they are equipped to handle meat, milk, cheese, eggs, fruits and vegetables.


Society would have to bring relatively strong people into the world because suffering people tend to use drugs and other "spirits" to assuage suffering.


Society would have to keep the environment accelerated so people had a chance to release disease but not sexually reproduce so they can assimilate to the strongest person in their environment and not pass on trauma and suffering onto the next generation.


Society would have to be surveilled by the powers that be to make sure someone who might be suffering does not harm anyone else or even themselves.


I see society right now exhibiting at least 50% of what I "propose", which is the acceleration of the environment, not giving young nubile girls a chance to get pregnant. If she does get pregnant, the fetus would destroy her if she was not strong enough to handle carrying her and a baby to term.


Right now, I do not see the system frowning upon marriages before 50 because by the time people are 50, many are breaking down immunologically, so to most people, getting married to someone who is breaking down is not appealing, unless they are a billionaire.

From my vantage point around surpassing the Hayflick Limit and getting a second lease on life, my idea makes sense. But during this great transition, my information probably won't resonate well on a traditional old world population.


Evolution must come from somewhere... How else can the human race survive if it was not for someone with ideas?


Why do you think they developed the Baby Boom and then developed so many different programs and genetic engineering?


Why do you think the world will reach a certain Tipping Point and then start declining and descending into some kind of controlled chaos?


The world is looking for the most strongest immune system, intellectuallly adaptive and strategic prototypes to carry on the human race.

And you are competing with everyone around you.


Family members are competing with other family members based upon how strong their immune system is and what they brought to the table.


 You are competing with your immune system, lifestyle, your culture your politics religion and science.


 Every single one of you are competing with somebody right next to you. You could have two people with two different ways of looking at the world live together.


 Does only one need to win? Not necessarily if you understand how to strategize both people to survive.


 But you can't force people. You give people the chance that are right next to you to survive. You give them a way out should they choose to get out. But somebody must be able to replace the income lost because someone has to be down and recoup resources.


 That's why I don't overspend or mortgage myself and my husband to the hilt.


 Whatever we have we could afford to lose and still keep the farm. Not literally the farm.

We could still keep the house


 But, you never force anyone to do something against their will. If you understand where I'm coming from then you will find ways to protect yourself and still contribute but also stand your ground around things that mean something.


And you will have to find a way to do that. And if your partner is not amenable to that then you make your choices.


This is about survival


And every single one of you are given a chance to be the Ultimate Survivor.




3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Last Post, Then Follow Me On Facebook

The ending is the beginning (gen x, your turn) There is a power in "canceling" yourself off the hamster wheel. You don't want to end your...

Comments


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page