Before climate change they wanted you to vote and give you the power to vote so that way you felt you were part of the process and you had a voice in the situation and they gave you the arguments familiar to you so you felt you had some representation. Then they added in a third party when people felt disenfranchised and that's why you had the independent movement and the green party and the libertarian and other third parties.
Once the system legitimized a third party to be on the ballot and was able to debate with both Democrat and Republican then the binary system blamed the third party for diluting the outcome ..
They blamed Ross Perot and other third-party candidates for diluting the outcome.
Ralph Nader and the green party was more about conditioning people for climate change and sustainability and you see where that got you, lithium mines, water droughts and hurricanes and died suddenly though I don't think the left wing Green Party Movement expected the died suddenly as part of the sustainability platform.
I also don't think Greenpeace expected the lithium mines to be all over up and down the West Coast. But they definitely got your money up there in Humboldt as they are choking on their cannabis trying to avoid the 2000 Brownfield redevelopment sites all over California and the contaminated water table
I'm sure all the Green Peace people investing in bicycles and walking to work are now taking their last breath as the heat is baking them from the inside out and they're working their ankles around the pedal biking to work in 150 degree weather and I wouldn't be surprised seeing people die suddenly on the bike path from the suburbs into the Sacramento Capital.
The dry heat is f****** deadly especially if you're biking to work because you're trying to save the planet.
Yeah you're killing yourself to save the planet basically. That's how it works
And then the pro-life and the pro-choice movement was to harvest future organ donors from died suddenly children and pregnant mothers and stem cells from the abortion clinics that they made sure you guys got hot and heavy with the sex and the circumcision
Even more importantly, the third party senators and representatives made a presence on the floor but sometimes they would convert to democrat or republican to compete because they still needed someone to blame and so other arguments were rolled out so you had something else to blame and then now you have the demonization of the Democrats and the Republicans and both of them are urging you to vote for them and they have made fools out of both Trump and Harris but they both have legitimate things to say
And both sides have something nasty to say about either one of them. They want you to want Trump and they also want people to want Harris and so no matter who's in charge somebody is going to blame somebody else.
However those who figured out all this b******* they know they can handle Harris or Trump because it's not going to matter who's in charge at this point.
And so when Harris or Trump wins Trump people will blame the Harris people and the Harris people will blame the Trump people and those who didn't vote we have to dodge the f****** bullets and not get caught in the crossfire
They also have MANY trump supporters calling themselves "trash or garbage"
Smh
Im NOT VOTING
But, please stop referring to yourself as garbage
Casting spells
It is done.
I can handle both parties.. those who dont vote wont complain.
I am prepared to deal with shitty people and shitty policies. Smh. Shitty doesnt discriminate
Those who voted, i blame you
If no one votes you'll be stuck with the same regime implementing what they intended to. If everybody votes you'll be stuck with the same regime who gave you your system to begin with..
It doesn't matter where you go because you can't hide from the system who built the system with their intentions.
They gave you the opportunities to participate within a very limited parameter and now the system is done and I hope you survive the transition
Before climate change and before the conspiracy world you trusted the numbers and the process and no one put any kind of doubt of impropriety or conspiracy. Once the conspiracy world was birthed everything was in question.
And so no matter who wins someone will question the legitimacy of the outcome and so it's done. It was done 20 years ago.
I think I'm pretty right on with my assessment because I was raised Democrat and I explored the bi-coastal independent movement, I became a conspiracy theorist and then supported Trump and now
I'm done
I won't be your scapegoat
If you want to save the planet the people in California need a sacrifice themselves. They are the 7th largest economy. I've had that s*** rammed down my throat when I was in California for f****** years.
My carbon footprint is smaller than those in California and I'm in Ohio and it is a red state.
And I have no children.
I have no pets
I don't have my own vehicle.
And I'm not a major consumer
And I've streamlined my immune system to be extremely effective in its business process and I don't travel a lot.
And so I understand Republicans in California are not buying into the green sustainability movement but there's a lot of Eco terrorists out there who've rammed their morals down my f****** throat. They have a larger carbon footprint than I will ever have by myself.
An ecoterrorist is someone who uses violence or the threat of violence to further environmental goals. Ecoterrorism is a more radical form of environmental action than eco-activism, which is non-violent and considered civil disobedience.
Ecoterrorists may target environmental resources or infrastructure to achieve political or ideological goals. Their actions are often symbolic and aimed at a larger audience than the immediate target. Some examples of issues that ecoterrorists have fought against include:
Logging, Drift-net fishing, Nuclear energy, Whaling, Road construction, and Wearing fur.
The FBI defines ecoterrorism as the use or threatened use of violence against innocent people or property for environmental-political reasons. However, some disagree with broad definitions of ecoterrorism, fearing that legitimate activity could be labeled as terrorism.
See insights and ads
Boost post
Like
Comment
Copy
Share
Comentarios