top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureJillian Epperly

Redefining the roles of people and relationship

Redefining the roles of people and relationship and what an Independent Woman/Man is, in my world.

Feel free to disagree, but ON YOUR OWN page.. and list out factors what you think an independent person is. I would never disagree with you, I just develop another model to work from because humans deserve CHOICES AND WITH choice, comes accountability. Mature humans embrace choice, NOT resist it..

Immature humans want to be told what to do and then resist and blame and destroy.. they eschew choice because it would mean they would have to be accountable for their choices.... god forbid, right..

Married Women, Who Do NOT "Work", in the traditional sense, Can Also Be EXTREMELY INDEPENDENT, IF NOT MORE, THAN SINGLE WORKING WOMEN, RELYING ON GIRLFRIENDS TO KEEP THEM DISTRACTED FORM BEING LONELY.

HOW ABOUT THAT?

dependent women/men hate being given choices to be accountable for because it is easier to be unaccountable for actions and then blame someone or something when all the conditions are right.

trolls try to silence choices and different info because they don't want another choice to be accountable for.. they love to blame and be dependent on someone or something until it does not go their way and then blame..

purposely staying ignorant of other choices gives trolls power to blame others for their choices in life..

it is circular reasoning.. they say, "i chose to be ignorant, therefore it is your fault I am ignorant"..

love=proximal distance for energy conversion of release and reproduction or dying and reproducing microbes/ideas or babies or people..

"deficient people" rely on love until everyone is depleted... if people were not there to love and support you, then there is no love to give or receive..

"self sufficient people" may not need to rely on love and devotion as they can develop their love/respect for themselves without requiring others to turn their hormones on/off on a continuous basis..

one cannot "love" from a distance unless you are in constant contact with a power dynamic of a winner/loser called dying/reproducing and an unofficial contract of turning on/off hormones with friends/family and strangers who "support" your business/lifestyle/belief system via official transactions which is conditional based upon expectations or needing handouts..

do I love my mother who I have not seen since 2016? No, I have an extremely healthy respect for her and her position and what she developed in me. Maturity might mean, no more love, now, are you conditioned to respect from a healthy distance?

Single people compromise .. Or else somebody is taking advantage of somebody else. And if there are issues with single people there's nothing binding them together.. They can just walk away

Married people are constantly negotiating with each other. It's harder to walk away when you're in a legally binding contract with somebody. Which is also why many men decide not to get married to the women they have children with.. They say love needs no piece of paper.. That's a cop out


"Compromise and negotiation are both skills that can help resolve conflict and maintain positive relationships. However, they are different in some ways:

Compromise

Involves two parties with different views meeting in the middle. Each party concedes something, and the end position is usually about halfway between the two parties' opening positions. A positive compromise is when both parties benefit.

Negotiation

Involves two parties entering an agreement, and each party gets a concession they want. Negotiation is the process of discussion between parties that are attempting to come to a mutual decision on an issue".

4 AI Generated above.


Charles Manson represented people influencing others to destroy others,

while Jesus Christ represented people influencing themselves to die for their friends and family from loyalty and complete and utter devotion..

Manson and Christ both used love and undying devotion as a tool for destruction..

obviously why Christ is more acceptable over Manson.

you destroy yourself over your own beliefs, NOT others. And if you are to take others down with you, then it must be approved by the govt via licenses and partnerships with legally binding contracts of consideration and acceptance and official transactions.

the 1960's Christian Revival and the Family Oriented Cannabis Peaceful Drug Addled Cults and Serial Killers/Manson were two sides of the same coin..

If you wanted to save yourself, today, you would have to question everything..



4 views0 comments

Comments


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page